Have We Become Too Politically Correct? Have We Become Too Politically Correct?
Over the weekend I went to see Miss Peregrine Home for Peculiar Children directed by Tim Burton because I’m a fan of Burton and the... Have We Become Too Politically Correct?

miss-peregrines-home-for-peculiar-children-_

Over the weekend I went to see Miss Peregrine Home for Peculiar Children directed by Tim Burton because I’m a fan of Burton and the movie looked very interesting. I have not read the original novel written by Ransom Riggs so going into the movie I was new to it. I really enjoyed the film and felt that Burton was a perfect choice to direct the film.

miss-peregrines-home-for-peculiar-children-df-03143_r_rgb

On Sunday a blogger DeLa Doll wrote a story about how the film lacked diversity and then quoted an interview where Burton stated his feelings about diversity.

First read the FULL interview on the matter at Bustle from September 28th before the film opened on the 30th (HERE)

Then read DeLa Doll comments about the story (HERE)

Her story was picked up by The Huffington Post and spread like wildfire through the internet. I read her comments and felt that while it’s one thing to not like a film or even a director, the way that she went after Burton and felt betrayed by him was simply ludicrous.

First Burton doesn’t owe her or anyone else anything. You either choose to see his films or not. If you like it great if not oh well. While I can see how Burton’s comments can come off differently to each of us and I can see how some can take it as crass. Burton cast a film as he sees fit. Honestly most films from the major studios are predominately white. Is it wrong or simple economics? That is another debate for another time. He has his vision of the world and the general public seems to like the films that he has made over the years.

eva-green-in-the-title-role-miss-peregrines-home-for-peculiar-children

Second she only mentions the book at the top because she read it and enjoyed it. I found it odd that if by reading the book that she didn’t get the whole based in Wales in 1940. Considering the current demographics of Wales in 2014 the percentage of white is 95.6% with blacks totaling a whopping 0.6%. I’m guessing that it wasn’t that much different back in 1940. The other thing that is completely lost on her is that the majority of the cast is mostly from England and the surrounding area. Asa Butterfield: London England, Ella Purnell: London England, Finlay MacMillan: Glasgow Scotland, Lauren McCrostie: London England, Hayden Keeler-Stone: Essex England, Georgia Pemberton: Kingston Upon Thames, Milo Parker: British and the other children appear to also be from England.

By casting the majority of the roles with British actors Burton is being very faithful to the location that the novel takes place it. It’s very unlikely that writer Ransom Riggs intended it to come off in any other way.

sam-jackson-miss-peregrine

She goes on to point out that Samuel L. Jackson is not only the single black actor in the film, but found it insulting that he was the villain. While on the surface this would a valid attack on Burton but a little thing call research put a huge hole in her “whitewashing” of him and the film. Jackson had previously played the villain in four other films where the cast is predominately white. Jumper (directed by Doug Liman), The Spirit (directed by Frank Miller), Unbreakable (directed by M. Night Shyamalan), and Kingsman: The Secret Service (directed by Matthew Vaughn). So if you use her logic here that all four of those directors are “”anti-PC” rich old white guy” because they choose to have Jackson play the villain in those films?

While I myself am a white male I am hardly far from being a rich old white guy. I can not comment on people of other ethnicity. I grew up in a small town in Ohio and there was only one black family that I knew of so does that make me a unable to understand diversity? I am all for diversity but when it comes to art (and that is what film is) it’s up to the individual artist or in this case director to make their choices on casting. Burton grew up in Burbank California in the 1960’s/1970’s that in 2012 was 72.07% white and 2.45% black. I imagine that it was lower back when Burton grew up there and I doubt that he had much interaction with diversity back then so that makes him very familiar with white suburbia because that’s what he grew up with.

Look at Edward Scissorhands that is a perfect example of how he sees suburbia. You wouldn’t expect F. Gary Gray who directed the powerful Straight Outta Compton do be able to capture the feel of white suburbia in Edward Scissorhands because he grew up in South Central L.A. and was able to use his life experiences to direct the film. Nor would Burton to direct Straight Outta Compton with his upbringing in Burbank would not understand how it was to grow up in Compton during the 1980’s

tim-burton-miss-peregrines-home-for-peculiar-children-shoot-670-380

What bothers me the most from DeLa Dolls rant about Burton is that she feels betrayed by him. I simply don’t understand why because while I can see his comments in the Bustle interview rubbing people the wrong way, how could you think that any film that Burton has ever directed would be considered Politically Correct or ethnically diverse? Why do people today feel that everything needs to be Politically Correct especially in film and art. Now I’m not talking about diversity that I fully agree we need but I view diversity as not a skin color but as diversity in voices.

I do not see diversity as a black and white thing. To me diversity should be new and different thoughts, ideas, and stories. You should not make a character in a film or television show LGBT or ethnic because it’s Politically Correct, you should do it because the story need to have that part to it. If you just slap diversity into a story then it never comes off as genuine. I can’t understand what it’s like to be a woman but if you tell a good strong female character in a story then I can at least relate to the character on an emotional level that I can feel and understand.

We have sadly became too sensitive to things and sadly that is affecting art in many forms. We will never see films like Blazing Saddles or Song of the South because they will somehow offend someone.

It’s really simple if you don’t like a film, book, television, or any other art then simply don’t view or support it. If you don’t like what you see in films or other art then instead of complaining about it, do something yourself. Everything doesn’t have to be about you and the world does not revolve around you either. Do we need to strive to make more diverse and interesting stories, absolutely. But simply not everything or everyone is going to do that and actions speak louder than words. If you don’t see things that relate to your gender, ethnic or lifestyle then you need to go out and make it or support those who you feel speak to what you would like to see. Life is not handed to you and it doesn’t owe you anything.

Steven Howearth

Steven Howearth

  • Adam Barajas

    October 5, 2016 #1 Author

    It is interesting to note that in her rant is that she basically says that if Tim Burton had not said anything then she wouldn’t have really had a problem with the film.

    This suggests that her problem is not really with diversity or lack of it in this film (or any other for that matter) but rather with the fact that someone has an opinion that is different from hers and that with this opinion, he has hurt her feelings.

    Mr. Burton is clear in the interview his problem is with the forced diversity that he observed in movies and television growing up that feels forced, unnecessary and disingenuous. I agree that this is exactly how it feels still today. Consider the recent controversy in Star Trek Beyond that made the character of Sulu a homosexual. This didn’t annoy me because the character was portrayed as such but it bothered me because for decades, the character of Sulu has been heterosexual. The change simply feels like (and really is) pandering and is a good example of forced diversity.

    Nowadays I feel like most forms of media include “token” characters that are put there strictly for the sake of checking a box on the P.C. punch list. Some writers even openly mock this like Trey Parker and Matt Stone do in South Park. These characters do not feel genuine or real and when they show up they take me out of story long enough for me to acknowledge that this was yet another example of how P.C. culture is over running creative freedom. This is true in any medium from film to comic books.

    And that is really what this argument is about: freedom. Some of us would like to see creative minds have the freedom to create something wonderful without having to worry about checking all diversity boxes. Others would like to have a direct say in what another person creates even to the point of forcing their hand. Like you said, we have the freedom to spend our money on the types of media that satisfies us the most. The market will respond on its own if we let it.

    For this young lady to get her feelings all shattered because of Mr. Burton’s interview is just ridiculous.

    One more thing. Her comment, “Who in this society is more outcasted than people of color?” is absolutely laughable and not just because “outcasted” isn’t a word. I don’t know a single black person who would consider themselves an outcast simply because he or she was black. I have three kids, not a single one of them has known an America where the president wasn’t a black man. Seriously, how can she not possibly think of a single more outcast demographic than “people of color” what a joke. How about the homeless? What about conservative Christians or Jews? How about the mentally handicapped? Give me a break.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: